Fantasy Wheel ©
Investigation
Psychopathology
Serial Crimes
Sex Offenders
Education
Research
Media
Victim Resources
Site Interaction
Contributors

 

BRACE Character Profile™ Analysis

 

Character Rated:  Fictional Character Michael Myers as portrayed in the movie Halloween

Input Ratings and Background:  Bryan Nelson, M.S. of www.deviantcrimes.com

Date of Input Ratings:  October 30, 2006

BRACE Character Profile™ Analysis:  Russell L. Smith, M.S.

Date of Report:  November 1, 2006

 

CHARACTER BACKGROUND (by Bryan Nelson):

“The character of Michael Myers was 6 years old when he killed his sister with a butcher knife and was placed in a hospital until he escaped at the age of 21. 

 

As a child he spent most of his time alone or and fantasized about exceeding the expectations of his parents (remember this for later).  He wet the bed and suffered from low self-esteem.  He desired to remain close to his mother and was encouraged to be more independent, which he took as rejection.  His desire to isolate left him without friends and with time to develop a sense of internal rage.  He was left with his grandmother often as a child and she was emotionally distant and strict.  He was also left to be watched by a neighbor who was a member of a cult, where he learned that to save the human race, a member of a person’s family must be sacrificed on Halloween.  Michael began to spend additional time with this neighbor and began to take on the beliefs of the cult.  He was chosen by the cult to kill his entire family.  The premise of the remainder of the Halloween series was his pursuit of his sister to meet the expectations of the cult (his new family).

 

It should be noted that Michael also hears voices, commanding him to perform evil.  The above statements may have been reports based upon his delusional patterns.  Michael is devoid of any affect and he chooses to remain isolated from others.  Most professionals in which Michael’s care is placed after the murder believe he is catatonic.  His primary doctor, Dr. Loomis believes Michael is a primary psychopath that has no interest in interacting with others and chooses to avoid contact with others and remain in his violent fantasy world.  He is methodical and experiences no sense of fear.  He has an obsessional quality toward meeting the ultimate goal of killing, sees all others as objects that are in his way, with his sister as the trophy for a fulfilled life.”

 

STANDARD INFORMATION:  The underlying structure of the BRACE Character Profile™ is based on three prototypical character types (Type A, Type B, and Type C), which are each rated on a 5-point scale on eight Cognitive variables, eight Behavior variables, and eight Existential or Motivation variables. The basic graphic generated by a BRACE Character Profile™ represents the degree to which the rated individual’s characteristic manner of thought, behavior, and motivation is similar to or different from each of the three prototypical character types. Once rated, the individual can be compared and contrasted with any previously rated individual, real or imagined, dead or alive, and to any other “prototypical” or archetype in the BRACE Character Profile™ database (DSM-IV-TR™[i] personality disorders, 40-point Hare PCL-R[ii], Asperger’s Disorder, ADHD, etc.).

 

The input ratings for the BRACE Character Profile™ can be completed by anyone with basic reading skills and the ability to objectively rate statements about a well known or well conceptualized character. Consensus input ratings by two or more individuals increases the knowledge base and minimizes rating biases. However, one objective rater with good knowledge of the character being rated is sufficient. An analysis of the BRACE Character Profile™ graphics and correlation charts requires basic knowledge of the three prototypical character types, which is available on the internet in the Frequently Asked Questions Section of www.BRACEanalysis.com and the Contributor section of Bryan Nelson’s website (http://www.deviantcrimes.com/BRACEindex.htm).

 

In brief, there are three core aspects of human nature that must be actively managed throughout life:  TYPE A, TYPE B, and TYPE C. Each person is more or less like Type A, more or less like Type B, and more or less like Type C throughout each day and each phase of their life. In the absence of developmental instruction and structure to the contrary and without active efforts to learn and teach self-control (self-discipline + self-restraint) and adaptive sensitivity to others, Type A and Type B and Type C patterns of THOUGHT, BEHAVIOR, and MOTIVATION become progressively more characteristic of humans.

 

TYPE A:  A pervasive pattern of seducibility and immaturity of thought based on self-delusion, fanciful flights into unrealistic expectations, and an absence of relevant and constructive focus; associated with a cultivated habit of self-justification based on simplistic generalizations and discriminations; marked by both cognitive and behavioral avoidance of the normal stresses of life; and, an enduring tendency to take the easy way to success ...

 

TYPE B:  A pervasive pattern of active and competing opposition to legitimate authority and noncompliance with essential structure, associated with a preoccupation with matters of power and control, marked by increasingly deviant and violent countercontrolling strategies and tactics ...

 

TYPE C:  A pervasive and progressive pattern of unearned and unwarranted self-reinforcement based on an unrestrained desire to experience first hand the limits of one’s physical, emotional and psychological being, all under the guise of self-expression and self-discovery ...

 

In the final analysis, the BRACE Character Profile™ merely puts the image that is in the rater’s mind into an objective and meaningful format, which can be shared and considered from many different angles, much like a hologram or a virtual reality tour of a house. The bits and pieces of information included in the input ratings are transformed into a virtual persona of the individual in the mind of the rater. This process is certainly affected by the knowledge base for input ratings, the objectivity and critical thinking skills of the rater, and the adherence of the rater to the BRACE Character Profile™ rating procedures, which are printed on the input form.

Note:  The A (black), B (red), and C (yellow) in the above chart and graphic corresponds to Type A, Type B, and Type C characteristics.

 

An analysis of a basic BRACE Character Profile™ graphic will take into consideration not only the nine points reflected in the basic graphic, but the average scores for each DOMAIN (Cognitive, Behavior, and Existential), and the average scores for each CHARACTER TYPE (A, B, and C). More advanced analysis takes into consideration the relationships of the three Types within and between the three Domains, as well as a more detailed analysis of the underlying variables. The basic graphic is used for a general analysis and quick visual comparisons with other graphics, such as DSM-IV-TR™ Personality Disorders, to generally “rule out” and “rule in” possible disorders, or any type of cluster of characteristics.

 

ANALYSIS OF BASIC GRAPHIC:  The basic graphic presents a character dominated by Type B characteristics (power and control) in each Domain, with exceptionally high dysfunction in the Cognitive and Existential Domains. The extreme Type B characteristics suggest that Michael Myers is a loner preoccupied with matters of power and control who has no close interpersonal ties. Note that Type B characteristics dominate the profile and should be given as much consideration as the overall correlations. At this gross level of analysis, psychosis can not be ruled out.

 

Several patterns are noteworthy: 

 

1) The V shape formed by Type B from Cognitive to Behavior to Existential particularly noteworthy, indicating some type of restraint related to the expression of Behavior. Michael Myers views the world in terms of power and control and is primarily motivated by matters related to power and control, but there is a significant level of force and violence that has not been expressed. Such a pattern could be due to some type of situational restraint (e.g., incarcerated or injured), some type of successful deception (e.g., similar to a spy or pedophile), the presence of a superior power, chemical restraint (medication), or merely a lack of opportunity. Regardless of the cause, he is highly motivated to engage in violent acting-out and this level of discrepancy can be described as an existential crisis consistent with an obsession and an unsatisfied compulsion.

 

2) The decreasing Type A characteristics from Cognitive to Behavior to Existential, suggests poor judgment but better than expected impulse control and higher than expected independent functioning.

 

3) The overall low Type C characteristics indicates a narrow range of interests and few reinforcing activities to compete with his motivation related to power and control. In fact, his highest source of pleasure and comfort is power and control, suggesting a rigid, narrowly focused, very constricted individual who would fit the profile of a stalker or serial killer.

 

The following graphic is used for quick visual comparisons with standardized DSM-IV-TR Personality Disorders. It is useful to rule out and rule in possible disorders. Even though this visual comparison is a “gross” level of analysis, it does shed some light on the basic graphic. However, with this and other graphic comparisons, one must keep in mind that similar Type and Domain scores may be generated by different underlying structures.

 

Left Side Graphics                                                    Right Side Graphics

301.0 Paranoid (likely match)                                  301.50 Histrionic (not likely)

301.20 Schizoid (possible traits)                              301.81 Narcissistic (not likely)

310.22 Schizotypal (possible traits)                         301.82 Avoidant (unclear)

301.7 Antisocial (possible traits)                             301.6 Dependent (not likely)

301.83 Borderline (unclear)                                     301.4 Obsessive-Comp. (likely match)

 

However, with this and other graphic comparisons, one must keep in mind that similar Type and similar Domain scores may be generated by different underlying structures. Bottom line is that a visual comparison of BRACE Character Profile™ graphics helps inform clinical opinion or the opinion of anyone familiar with the BRACE Character Profile™. Some alternatives can be ruled-out and others more seriously considered through a more detailed analysis of underlying variables and correlations. When a more sophisticated analysis is required, the ratings that make up each component part of the graphics can be correlated for direct comparison with any “prototypical type” or any other individual in the database. It is a quantum leap into the nature of the person rated.

 

On the following pages, are correlation charts for each of the 10 DSM-IV-TR Personality Disorders, Asperger’s Disorder, and a prototypical 40-point HARE PCL-R. Just glancing at this data may reveal a wealth of information to a clinician or someone familiar with the BRACE Character Profile™. First, a comment about DSM-IV-TR and “prototypical Personality Disorders” and their correlations with a character’s BRACE Character Profile™.

 

BRACE Character Profile™ CORRELATION SUMMARY ANALYSIS AIDES:

 

NOTE:  A clinician using the BRACE Character Profile™ graphics and correlations for the DSM-IV-TR™ diagnostic categories will need to keep in mind that the DSM-IV-TR™ Personality Disorders are not equal in terms of the types of information used as a “diagnostic criteria” --- nor are they equal in terms of the number of available criteria that must be met in order for a diagnosis to be made --- nor are they equal in terms of the number and types of other qualifiers which must be taken into consideration in order to make a diagnosis. DSM-IV-TR™ is a categorical classification, but all members of a diagnostic class are not homogeneous, class boundaries are not clear, and there is significant overlap between “classifications.”

 

The BRACE Character Profile™ is a dimensional classification system which provides numerical and graphic information, which may be subthreashold, based on a quantification of core characteristics common to human nature. In fact, negative correlations provide as much clinical information as positive correlations. Bottom line is that visual comparisons of BRACE Character Profile™ graphics correlation charts help inform clinical opinion or the opinion of anyone familiar with the BRACE Character Profile™. Some alternatives can be ruled-out and others more seriously considered through a more detailed analysis of underlying variables and correlations.

 

The color coding used in the BRACE Character Profile™ correlation charts is somewhat like a traffic light: 

 

         green is a GO for high positive correlation (.05 or higher).

         yellow is a CAUTION for a positive correlation which deserves consideration (.1 to .06).

         red is a STOP, which indicates a negative correlation of .1 or higher.

 

Actually, the negative correlations provide as much useful clinical and practical information as the positive correlations. It is the combination of high correlations, both positive and negative, that yields the analysis. If one knows how a person thinks, what a person thinks about, what a person does, and what a person wants, then the person is 100% profiled. On the flip side, if one knows how a person does NOT think, what a person does NOT think about, what a person does NOT do, and what a person does NOT want, then the person is also 100% profiled.

 

Considering the 10 DSM-IV-TR™ personality disorders, when there are several significant positive correlations and several significant negative correlations that consistently complement each other in terms of the functional characteristics, the individual profiled is well formulated and has a high level of definition provided by the stark contrasts.

 

Note that “Diagnostic Considerations” means exactly that ... consider ... and apply clinical skills. The correlations are indicators, but analysis requires consideration of known facts, other sources of information, and the analysis of each Type (A, B, and C) and each Domain (Cognitive, Behavior, and Existential). The BRACE Character Profile™ reflects patterns, characteristics of thought, behavior, and motivation --- it does not presume to make clinical diagnoses. There are many potential clinical paths to any cluster of cognitive-behavioral-existential characteristics.

 

The following correlation charts (analysis aides for profilers and clinicians) include prototypical types (i.e., archetypes) for the 10 DSM-IV-TR™ Personality Disorders, a 40-point HARE PCL-R, and Asperger’s Disorder.

 

 The following corresponds to the columns in the charts below:

1 = Paranoid Personality Disorder (301.0)                      7 = Narcissistic Personality Disorder (301.81)

2 = Schizoid Personality Disorder (301.20)                     8 = Avoidant Personality Disorder (301.82)

3 = Schizotypal Personality Disorder (301.22)               9 = Dependent Personality Disorder (301.6)

4 = Antisocial Personality Disorder (301.7)                   10 = Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder (301.4)

5 = Borderline Personality Disorder (301.83)                 11 = prototypical 40-point Hare PCL-R

6 = Histrionic Personality Disorder (301.50)                  12 = Asperger’s Disorder (299.80)

 

 

BRIEF ANALYSIS:  Michael Myers has strong paranoid and obsessive-compulsive characteristics in combination with a marked absence of borderline and histrionic characteristics. This combination suggests an isolated individual of focused purpose and serious demeanor who is mentally and physically preoccupied with matters of power and control. There is an absence of antisocial, narcissistic, and psychopathic characteristics but a delusion based psychosis can not be ruled out. Taking into consideration that Type B characteristics dominate the profile, there are strong indications that Michael Myers is not only socially detached but that strong underlying social fears feed his obsession with acquiring, maintaining, and exercising power and control. The significant Type C and Type B schizotypal characteristics suggest a reduced capacity for close interpersonal relationships and cognitive-perceptual distortions, which may reflect delusional beliefs and very proactive social avoidance and related violent acting-out (e.g., serial rapist, serial murderer, serial arsonist, terrorist).

 

The above charts are available for others to do their own analysis.

 

Thank you for the opportunity to profile this interesting character,

Russell L. Smith, M.S.

www.BRACEanalysis.com

Knot4u2no@aol.com


 


[i] American Psychiatric Association:  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2000.

[ii] Hare, R.D. (1991) The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto, Canada:  Multi-Health Systems.

 

 

                   

 

                               E-mail your questions or suggestions to Bryan Nelson

Last Updated:   11/22/2008

© 2002-2009, Deviant Crimes