Fantasy Wheel ©
Investigation
Psychopathology
Serial Crimes
Sex Offenders
Education
Research
Media
Victim Resources
Site Interaction
Contributors

 

BRACE Character Profile™ Report:  Friday the 13th’s Jason

 

Name of Person Rated:  Fictional Character Jason from the movie Friday the 13th

Input Ratings By:   Joseph of www.deviantcrimes.com message board

Date of Input Ratings:  July 5, 2004

Dates of Report:  Original Report July 5, 2004. Updated October 23, 2006

Graphics and Analysis Aides Generated by:  Russell L. Smith

BRACE Character Profile™ Analysis by:  Russell L. Smith

 

Thank you for selecting BRACE Analysis to profile the fictional character Jason from the movie Friday the 13th. Such profiles help in our standardization and are often used to train others in how to complete and analyze the BRACE Character Profile™. As all such reports, this report will include some standard information about the BRACE Character Profile™, followed by the unique character Jason as conceptualized by you. As I indicated in an earlier email:

 

“I entered the numbers in the number cruncher and can honestly say that this is an entirely unique character that has awesome features entirely consistent with my memory of the movie. It may be a while before I can generate a related Word for Windows document, but I will get you something ASAP ... You are going to like this!”

 

NOTE:  SKIP TO THE END OF REPORT IF ALL YOU ARE INTERESTED IN IS THE BRIEF NARRATIVE ANALYSIS

 

STANDARD INFORMATION:  The underlying structure of the BRACE Character Profile™ is based on three prototypical character types (Type A, Type B, and Type C), which are each rated on a 5-point scale on eight Cognitive variables, eight Behavior variables, and eight Existential or Motivation variables. The basic graphic generated by a BRACE Character Profile™ represents the degree to which the rated individual’s characteristic manner of thought, behavior, and motivation is similar to or different from each of the three prototypical character types. Once rated, the individual can be compared and contrasted with any previously rated individual, real or imagined, dead or alive, and to any other “prototypical” or archetype in the BRACE Character Profile™ database (DSM-IV-TR™[1] personality disorders, 40-point Hare PCL-R[2], Asperger’s Disorder, ADHD, etc.).

 

The input ratings for the BRACE Character Profile™ can be completed by anyone with basic reading skills and the ability to objectively rate statements about a well known or well conceptualized. The BRACE Character Profile™ provides a wealth of information, but the individual rated must be clearly imagined. Consensus input ratings by two or more individuals increases the knowledge base and minimizes rating biases. However, one objective rater with good knowledge of the character being rated is sufficient. An analysis of the BRACE Character Profile™ graphics and correlation charts requires basic knowledge of the three prototypical character types, which is available on the internet in the Frequently Asked Questions Section of www.BRACEanalysis.com and the Contributor section of www.deviantcrimes.com

 

In brief, there are three core aspects of human nature that must be actively managed throughout life:  TYPE A, TYPE B, and TYPE C. Each person is more of less like Type A, more or less Type B, and more or less Type C throughout each day and each phase of their life. In the absence of developmental instruction and structure to the contrary and without active efforts to learn and teach self-control (self-discipline + self-restraint) and adaptive sensitivity to others, Type A and Type B and Type C patterns of THOUGHT, BEHAVIOR, and MOTIVATION become progressively characteristic of humans.

 

TYPE A:  A pervasive pattern of seducibility and immaturity of thought based on self-delusion, fanciful flights into unrealistic expectations, and an absence of relevant and constructive focus; associated with a cultivated habit of self-justification based on simplistic generalizations and discriminations; marked by both cognitive and behavioral avoidance of the normal stresses of life; and, an enduring tendency to take the easy way to success ...

 

TYPE B:  A pervasive pattern of active and competing opposition to legitimate authority and noncompliance with essential structure, associated with a preoccupation with matters of power and control, marked by increasingly deviant and violent countercontrolling strategies and tactics ...

 

TYPE C:  A pervasive and progressive pattern of unearned and unwarranted self-reinforcement based on an unrestrained desire to experience first hand the limits of one’s physical, emotional and psychological being, all under the guise of self-expression and self-discovery ...

 

In the final analysis, the BRACE Character Profile™ merely puts the image that is in the rater’s mind into an objective and meaningful format, which can be shared and considered from many different angles, much like a hologram or a virtual reality tour of a house. The bits and pieces of information included in the input ratings are transformed into a virtual persona of the individual in the mind of the rater. This process is certainly affected by the knowledge base for input ratings, the objectivity and critical thinking skills of the rater, and the adherence of the rater to the BRACE Character Profile™ rating procedures, which are printed on the input form.

 

An analysis of a basic BRACE Character Profile™ graphic will take into consideration not only the nine points reflected in the basic graphic, but the average scores for each DOMAIN (Cognitive, Behavior, and Existential), and the average scores for each CHARACTER TYPE (A, B, and C). More advanced analysis takes into consideration the relationships of the three Types within and between the three Domains, as well as a more detailed analysis of the underlying variables. The basic graphic is used for a general analysis and quick visual comparisons with other graphics, such as DSM-IV-TR™ Personality Disorders, to generally “rule out” and “rule in” possible disorders, or any type of cluster of characteristics.

 

Below is Jason’s basic BRACE Character Profile™ graphic. Keep in mind that this graphic represents your conceptions of this individual.


 

Note:  The A (black), B (red), and C (yellow) in the above chart and graphic corresponds to Type A, Type B, and Type C characteristics.

 

The following graphic is used for quick visual comparisons with standardized DSM-IV-TR Personality Disorders. It is useful to rule out and rule in possible disorders. Even though this visual comparison is a “gross” level of analysis, it does shed some light on the basic graphic. However, with this and other graphic comparisons, one must keep in mind that similar Type and Domain scores may be generated by different underlying structures.

 

Left Side Graphics                                                    Right Side Graphics

301.0 Paranoid (likely match)                                  301.50 Histrionic (not likely)

301.20 Schizoid (possible traits)                               301.81 Narcissistic (not likely)

310.22 Schizotypal (likely match)                             301.82 Avoidant (unclear)

301.7 Antisocial (unclear)                                         301.6 Dependent (unclear)

301.83 Borderline (unclear)                                      301.4 Obsessive-Comp. (likely match)

 

However, with this and other graphic comparisons, one must keep in mind that similar Type and similar Domain scores may be generated by different underlying structures. Bottom line is that a visual comparison of BRACE Character Profile™ graphics helps inform clinical opinion or the opinion of anyone familiar with the BRACE Character Profile™. Some alternatives can be ruled-out and others more seriously considered through a more detailed analysis of underlying variables and correlations. When a more sophisticated analysis is required, the ratings that make up each component part of the graphics can be correlated for direct comparison with any “prototypical type” or any other individual in the database. It is a quantum leap into the nature of the person rated.

 

On the following pages, I am including correlation charts for each of the 10 DSM-IV-TR Personality Disorders, Asperger’s Disorder, and a prototypical 40-point HARE PCL-R. Just glancing at this data may reveal a wealth of information to a clinician or someone familiar with the BRACE Character Profile™. First, a comment about DSM-IV-TR and “prototypical Personality Disorders” and their correlations with a character’s BRACE Character Profile™.

 

BRACE Character Profile™ CORRELATION SUMMARY ANALYSIS AIDES:

 

NOTE:  A clinician using the BRACE Character Profile™ graphics and correlations for the DSM-IV-TR™ diagnostic categories will need to keep in mind that the DSM-IV-TR™ Personality Disorders are not equal in terms of the types of information used as a “diagnostic criteria” --- nor are they equal in terms of the number of available criteria that must be met in order for a diagnosis to be made --- nor are they equal in terms of the number and types of other qualifiers which must be taken into consideration in order to make a diagnosis. DSM-IV-TR™ is a categorical classification, but all members of a diagnostic class are not homogeneous, class boundaries are not clear, and there is significant overlap between “classifications.”

 

The BRACE Character Profile™ is a dimensional classification system which provides numerical and graphic information, which may be subthreashold, based on a quantification of core characteristics common to human nature. In fact, negative correlations provide as much clinical information as positive correlations. Bottom line is that visual comparisons of BRACE Character Profile™ graphics correlation charts help inform clinical opinion or the opinion of anyone familiar with the BRACE Character Profile™. Some alternatives can be ruled-out and others more seriously considered through a more detailed analysis of underlying variables and correlations.

 

The color coding used in the BRACE Character Profile™ correlation charts is somewhat like a traffic light: 

 

•         green is a GO for high positive correlation (.05 or higher).

•         yellow is a CAUTION for a positive correlation which deserves consideration (.1 to .06).

•         red is a STOP, which indicates a negative correlation of .1 or higher.

 

Actually, the negative correlations provide as much useful clinical and practical information as the positive correlations. It is the combination of high correlations, both positive and negative, that yields the analysis. If one knows how a person thinks, what a person thinks about, what a person does, and what a person wants, then the person is 100% profiled. On the flip side, if one knows how a person does NOT think, what a person does NOT think about, what a person does NOT do, and what a person does NOT want, then the person is also 100% profiled.

 

Considering the 10 DSM-IV-TR™ personality disorders, when there are several significant positive correlations and several significant negative correlations that consistently complement each other in terms of the functional characteristics, the individual profiled is well formulated and has a high level of definition provided by the stark contrasts.

 

Note that “Diagnostic Considerations” means exactly that ... consider ... and apply clinical skills. The correlations are indicators, but analysis requires consideration of known facts, other sources of information, and the analysis of each Type (A, B, and C) and each Domain (Cognitive, Behavior, and Existential). The BRACE Character Profile™ reflects patterns, characteristics of thought, behavior, and motivation --- it does not presume to make clinical diagnoses. There are many potential clinical paths to any cluster of cognitive-behavioral-existential characteristics.

 

The following correlation charts (analysis aides for profilers and clinicians) include prototypical types (i.e., archetypes) for the 10 DSM-IV-TR™ Personality Disorders, a 40-point HARE PCL-R, and Asperger’s Disorder.  

 

The following corresponds to the columns in the chart below:

1 = Paranoid Personality Disorder (301.0)                      7 = Narcissistic Personality Disorder (301.81)

2 = Schizoid Personality Disorder (301.20)                     8 = Avoidant Personality Disorder (301.82)

3 = Schizotypal Personality Disorder (301.22)               9 = Dependent Personality Disorder (301.6)

4 = Antisocial Personality Disorder (301.7)                    10 = Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder (301.4)

5 = Borderline Personality Disorder (301.83) 11 = prototypical 40-point Hare PCL-R

6 = Histrionic Personality Disorder (301.50)                   12 = Asperger’s Disorder (299.80)

 

 

Brief BRACE Character Profile™ Narrative Analysis of Jason :

 

Awesome character. Great job, Joseph!

 

Jason is NOT a psychopath and Jason is NOT an Antisocial Personality Disorder. Yet, we know he is a multiple murderer who would be legally responsible for his behavior under the law. He has power and control characteristics consistent with a Paranoid Personality Disorder, plus narrow, highly focus interests consistent with Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder, and a detached, distorted perception of the world consistent with a Schizotypal Personality Disorder with Schizoid features. Perhaps the most defining characteristic is the significant negative correlation with Histrionic Personality Disorder and the absence of narcissism throughout the profile. This is the primary reason he is not a psychopath.

 

Jason’s “soul” is revealed in the TYPE C BEHAVIOR category. He is Dependent, Obsessive-Compulsive, and very out of touch with other people. Look up Asperger’s Disorder (299.80) in DSM-IV-TR. Keep in mind that Jason is quite unique and people with Asperger’s Disorder are not inherently dangerous. But, Jason’s mask is worth a thousand expressions.

 

I hope this analysis helps explain some of Jason’s cognitive-behavioral-existential functioning. Your feedback as to its accuracy will be useful.

 

Sincerely,

Russell L. Smith

Knot4u2no@aol.com

 

[1] American Psychiatric Association:  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2000.

[2] Hare, R.D. (1991) The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto, Canada:  Multi-Health Systems.

 

 

                   

 

                               E-mail your questions or suggestions to Bryan Nelson

Last Updated:   01/03/2011

© 2002-2011, Deviant Crimes